Passenger of a post Malaysian flight path interview
Recently a friend of mine, D.J., flew to Phuket Thailand for a holiday on March 3, 2014. Prior to the illusive disappearance of flight MH370 and just following the planes vanishing act, she returned to Canada. She joins us in conversation regarding her flight experience and recounted her experience in the Asian Airports during the unfolding of events surrounding the missing flight.
During her trip to Asia she experienced several times where they not only scanned her passport extensively, but also took pictures of her and her husband before they entered the country, as well again when they left Thailand.
She recounts for us how security during the flight across was no different than when she returned. She also discusses her encounter with security and how the flight pilots were NOT subjected to any type of security protocols as were ordinary passengers. She describes the details of how she found out about the flight MH370’s disappearance and what the reaction of both locals as well as fellow passengers were during her return flight.
It is interesting to me how she recounts her flight paths deviation of 45 minutes into land mass from their original course over the ocean, while we are told by the mainstream media the search area is on land mass. She expresses that her path would actually take you over what is believed to be the then current or active search area location. I noticed while reviewing different details of the flight path being pushed by the mainstream media that the flight apparently veered towards land. Why then (begs the questions) did they detour over the said search area and not over the ocean as usual? You would think they would need to keep the area of search clear. Unless they are actually searching over the ocean and not releasing or conveying that information to the public. Why hide the parameters of the search area? Why lie about the location of suspicion? In my opinion the reason is to keep this flight as obscure and mysterious as possible. I am of the opinion the flight either never occurred or was re-directed to some island out towards the Pacific.
DJ tells us of the extent to which her passport was scanned and asks the question “Why even have a passport at all, if they are not interlinked to some (as we are lead to believe) data base?” The passports were apparently stolen 2 years prior to this incident. Why would they not have this information on record? What I also find interesting is the fact that mainstream media initially reported that the individuals who had their passports stolen were also scheduled to be on that very flight MH370. Who would have known their plans to board? Or is this a setup or staged event from the beginning? No person who has stolen your passport (2 years prior) would have access the knowledge of what flight or travel arrangements you had made with a new passport. The whole scenario begins to fall apart once you look a bit closer at what the media is trying to have you believe.
Another interesting feature to the interview was regarding the non-reaction or non-lock down circumstances once the airplane disappeared. Security was neither tightened nor protocols changed in order to prevent further breaches in the system. It still leaves me wondering whether or not this whole flight even occurred. Was it an excuse to “disappear” a number of high-ranking individuals aboard the flight? Was it an excuse to accost certain very intelligent assets in the electromagnetic technology industry? It has been stated in various articles that those in the manifest are in fact very important science and technology inventors, while in fact they are not actually releasing the manifest to the public. Speculation or not, there are many questionable circumstances surrounding this flight, its path, and the continued search for its whereabouts. Be that as it may, there is definitely something wrong about the whole story they have released to us as facts.
It must be noted that various experienced pilots have come forward to shoot holes into the mainstream story. Boeing 777 had a lawsuit that was pursued post 911 to stop any such hijacking from occurring again. Please watch the attached video from Able Danger regarding the lawsuit. It was stated by Boeing they would have these auto pilots in place by 2006. If this suit towards Boeing was not in place, then they would be the major avenue to pursue regarding insurance or compensation to family members of the loss of their relatives.
jimstonefreelance.comMarch 16 2014
Mails are still HEAVILY CENSORED, with well known people failing to get through.
There has been no new information to change my position on flight 370, BUT, I will add these points that people made in the mails that did make it:
A man from Germany made an obvious point – the transponder is what tells foreign countries that an approaching aircraft is not hostile, and in ALL CASES, even in total third world countries such as Bolivia, fighter jets will scramble to intercept an aircraft that is not identified by a transponder. GOOD POINT, THAT is what a transponder is really for, with regard to radar the transponder does not do anything. So if this plane flew for up to 7 hours absent being cloaked, SOMEONE WOULD HAVE SCRAMBLED. Only an electronic warfare oriented “escort” craft could have gotten flight 370 to wherever it went via a falsified transponder beacon or outright radar jamming.
Second really good point was that Tucson Arizona is another good place to look for this airplane.
There were other comments regarding this plane really going to Viet Nam and other places. As far as I see it, that’s the same as arguing whether a plane hit the Pentagon or if thermate was used, or directed energy weapons were used, it’s all at that level irrelevant. The important thing to know is that this plane could not have vanished according to the official story, this all happened as an act of war and those chinese engineers are now in U.S. custody and it does not matter if they are in Viet Nam, Afghanistan, Diego Garcia, or heavily drugged and eating at In-N-Out in Bakersfield as they learn just how “great” America is, and how well they will be paid for giving up Chinese secrets.
The plane will probably be used in a future “terror attack” if the story line goes well enough for them to not be forced to blow it up over the ocean to provide “proof” of what happened to it. And the ziopress is pushing the hijacking line really hard as they laugh about rocket attacks from Gaza that are OBVIOUSLY JUST DUMPED OVER WHEELBARROWS FULL OF CONSTRUCTION WASTE OR A JACK HAMMERED SIDEWALK Seriously – look at them laughing in the photo at the pile of “rocket debris” that was obviously just dumped there and not the result of any blast, we can’t get the truth in ANYTHING from zion, including via British originated now run from Quatar Rothchild psy op Al Jazeera.
HOLD YOUR BREATH, tomorrow (Monday March 17) could be big, I still maintain that flight 370 was hijacked as a precursor to world war 3, let’s just hope it does not go the way the bankers want if it all gets started and the world finally breaks free of their death grip, they have gambled an awful lot in a nuclear armed world, let’s hope Russia “gets it” and chooses the correct targets. And even if not, let’s hope the bankers one way or another totally lose it. It’s high time for them to lose from war rather than gain.
Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot
I am a retired Delta pilot. On 10 December, 2006 I informed FAA, FBI and NWA of the Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot. It was used against Adam Air 574 in a manner consistent with the loss yesterday of the B777 enroute Kaula Lampur to China.
Please advise me if Delta ALPA Safety Reps have educated the Delta Pilot Group of the BUAP that I forced Boeing to announce on 3 March, 2007 in response to my lawsuit filed against Boeing and ALPA of 27 February, 2007. That lawsuit was Civil Case 3:07-cv-24 and resulted in Boeing doing the right thing in announcing the deployment of the BUAP to be completed by March, 2009. Here is the article of Boeing’s response to my lawsuit:
New autopilot will make another 9/11 impossible
My question to DPA and Delta ALPA Safety is on what date did Delta ensure that all Delta pilots are aware of what Boeing has stated 7 years ago would be installed by March, 2009.
The significance is that if any ALPA pilots are not aware of this ‘feature’ they cannot comply with FAR 121.533.
In regards to yesterday’s B777 hull loss expect to see the attached tax document anchoring a chapter published demonstrating the similarities of yesterday’s loss to Adam Air 574 to Sukhoi Superjet lost in May, 2012.
Please note that defattru email address goes to Russian Air Force, Sukhoi and GRU. If you are not aware of who GRU is perhaps you should be.
QRS-11—Quartz Rate Sensor
The QRS-11 GyroChip sensor is used on commercial aircraft to rotate the antenna to receive signals from satellites for the in-flight entertainment system, radar tracking and flight controls. If the aircraft is equipped with an uninterruptable autopilot, signals can be received from a satellite to remotely fly the aircraft.
The sensor provides stabilization, flight control, and guidance. It also is used in missiles, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV ) and other military as well as space and industrial applications. Because of the sensitive nature of its military applicatons, the export of the technology is regulated.
We allege that the QRS-11 can be used as part of a package of technology to guide aircraft equipped with uninterruptable autopilots turning them into weapons.
We believe that the patent for the device was originally obtained by the Rose Law Firm of Little Rock, AR, specifically by patent lawyer Hillary Clinton, for BEI Technologies, Inc. headquartered at that time in Arkansas.
BEI has deversifed many times since then and the QRS-11 is now Manufactured by CST Systron Donner Inertial.
Below is information from the CST Systron Donner Inertial website:
QRS11 High Performance (Military Grade) Rate Sensor
The QRS11 is a compact, lightweight design, that features Quartz MEMS technology providing a solid-state gyro offering virtually unlimited life. The QRS11’s combination of high performance and long life makes it well suited for OEM’s and system integrators designing cost effective, high performance systems.
The QRS11 requires only DC voltage inputs to provide reliable, extremely accurate angular rate measurements with the benefit of no moving parts. With a hermetically sealed sensing element, the QRS11 has provided reliable performance in aircraft, missile and space systems across many demanding application environments.
Military Fixed Wing
UAV – Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
Missile Guidance & Control
Precision Guided Munitions
Wind Turbine Control
UGV – Unmanned Ground Vehicle
Tank Turret Stabilization
Man Portable Navigation
ROV – Remotely Operated Vehicle
Pilot of missing Malaysian flight reportedly a political extremist
Some are speculating that the Malaysian flight could have been hijacked by the pilot
By Staff Writer
MALAYSIA (INTELLIHUB) — Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah, a father-of-three, is the pilot on the missing Malaysian flight. According to the Daily Mail, he was said to be a ‘fanatical’ supporter of the country’s opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim, and was reportedly heavily involved politically with Ibrahim.
To make matters even more interesting, Ibrahim was jailed for homosexuality and given a five-year sentence just hours before the jet disappeared. Many believe that the hijack could be a protest in response to this sentence.
It has also been revealed that the pilot’s wife and three children moved out of the family home the day before the plane went missing.
“Colleagues made it clear to us that he was someone who held strong political beliefs and was strident in his support for Anwar Ibrahim,’ an investigation source said. ‘We were told by one colleague he was obsessed with politics.’
In their interviews, colleagues said Zaharie told them he planned to attend the court case involving Anwar on March 7, just hours before the hijacked flight.
Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370: Could Jet’s System Have Been Hacked?
Could the computer system on Malaysia Airlines MH370 have been tampered with?Wikimedia Commons
A document filed on the US Federal Register website indicates that aircraft manufacturer Boeing applied to have additional security installed aboard some of its 777 series of airplanes five months ago to prevent onboard hacking of critical computer systems.
Boeing said that it was upgrading the 777-200, 777-300 and 777-300ER series of passenger jet with a new onboard network system.
Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 Plane with 239 On Board Disappears Over Vietnamese Air Space
Missing Malaysia Flight MH370: Airline ‘Shocked’ at Co-Pilot Security Breach Revelations
Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370: Did Slow Decompression Leave Passengers Unconscious?
Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 Conspiracy Theories: Logical, Weird, Mysterious and Absurd
Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370: TIMELINE of Events from Jet’s Midnight Take-off to its Mysterious Vanishing
The concern was that the passenger inflight entertainment system would be connected to critical systems for managing the safety and maintenance of the aircraft.
Passenger seatback entertainment systems come with ethernet and USB ports, which would in theory enable access to a hacker to the critical computer systems.
Boeing asked the Federal Aviation Administration to alter its licence to allow it to add a “network extension device” to separate the various systems from each other.
That would prevent accidental or delibarate tampering with the critical system.
“This proposed data network and design integration may result in security vulnerabilities from intentional or unintentional corruption of data and systems critical to the safety and maintenance of the airplane,” the document reads.
“The existing regulations and guidance material did not anticipate this type of system architecture or electronic access to aircraft systems. Furthermore, regulations and current system safety assessment policy and techniques do not address potential security vulnerabilities, which could be caused by unauthorised access to aircraft data buses and servers.”
The Federal Aviation Administration approved the licence change and told Boeing that the new system design had to protect against “unauthorised sources internal to the airplane” and “prevent inadvertent and malicious changes to, and all adverse impacts upon, airplane equipment, systems, networks, or other assets required for safe flight and operations”.
Boeing also had to make sure that adding the network extension device followed safety guidelines and would not have an impact on the aircraft’s flying capability.
Could a problem with the software keeping the plane’s computer systems separate have led to accidental tampering with the critical systems?
New Scientist is reporting that the Malaysia Airlines jet sent out at least two bursts of technical data using the Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) before it disappeared. The useful engine data relates to critical flight systems and avionics.
Although Malaysia Airlines said that the plane made no distress calls, the engine data may hold clues. According to International Civil Aviation Organisation rules, such reports are normally kept secret until air investigators need them.
Emergency landing round-up
Boeing wins patent on uninterruptible autopilot system
Published 4 December 2006
New technology can be activated by the pilots, government agencies, even on-board sensors; not even a tortured pilot can give up control; dedicated electrical circuits ensure the system’s total independence
Although airplane cockpit door locks are now standard, worries remain about terrorists taking control of a plane a la 9/11, perhaps by extorting the pilots into opening the door against their better judgement. Elsewhere in today’s issue we report on a new Raytheon contract to develop software that uses type of craft, location, and fuel capacity to determine the safest route for a hijacked or otherwise compromised aircraft. This is a great idea, one that must have Chicago, Illinois-based Boeing excited — not out of envy but because it improves the value of its recently awarded patent for a system that, once activated, takes control of the airplane away from the pilots and flies it to a predtermined landing position. Put the Raytheon and the Boeing systems together — now that’s a good idea.
Boeing’s is, of course, not the first autopilot technology in existence, but this one has been designed with counterterrorism first and foremost in mind. Not only is it “uninterruptible” — so that even a tortured pilot cannot turn it off — but it can be activated remotely via radio or satellite by government agencies. The system might even include senors on the cockpit door that activate the autopilot of a certain amount of force is used against it. “There is a need for a technique that ensures the continuation of the desired path of travel of a vehicle by removing any type of human decision process that may be influenced by the circumstances of the situation, including threats or further violence onboard the vehicle,” the patent application explains. To make it fully independent, the system also has its own power supply, independent of the aircraft’s circuit breakers.
Thx for visiting MaxResistance.com plz click on home page for more news and videos.
Also plz bookmark the home page and click the follow button on the bottom right of your screen thx!