Sofia Smallstorm – Parens Patriae: Big Brother Owns You
[Latin, Parent of the country.] A doctrine that grants the inherent power and authority of the state to protect persons who are legally unable to act on their own behalf.
In law, it refers to the public policy power of the state to intervene against an abusive or negligent parent, legal guardian or informal caretaker, and to act as the parent of any child or individual who is in need of protection. For example, some children, incapacitated individuals, and disabled individuals lack parents who are able and willing to render adequate care, thus requiring state intervention.
The parens patriae doctrine has its roots in English Common Law. In feudal times various obligations and powers, collectively referred to as the “royal prerogative,” were reserved to the king. The king exercised these functions in his role of father of the country.
In the United States, the parens patriae doctrine has had its greatest application in the treatment of children, mentally ill persons, and other individuals who are legally incompetent to manage their affairs. The state is the supreme guardian of all children within its jurisdiction, and state courts have the inherent power to intervene to protect the best interests of children whose welfare is jeopardized by controversies between parents. This inherent power is generally supplemented by legislative acts that define the scope of child protection in a state.
The state, acting as parens patriae, can make decisions regarding mental health treatment on behalf of one who is mentally incompetent to make the decision on his or her own behalf, but the extent of the state’s intrusion is limited to reasonable and necessary treatment.
The doctrine of parens patriae has been expanded in the United States to permit the attorney general of a state to commence litigation for the benefit of state residents for federal antitrust violations (15 U.S.C.A. § 15c). This authority is intended to further the public trust, safeguard the general and economic welfare of a state’s residents, protect residents from illegal practices, and assure that the benefits of federal law are not denied to the general population.
States may also invoke parens patriae to protect interests such as the health, comfort, and welfare of the people, interstate Water Rights, and the general economy of the state. For a state to have standing to sue under the doctrine, it must be more than a nominal party without a real interest of its own and must articulate an interest apart from the interests of particular private parties.
(paa-wrens pat-tree-eye) n. Latin for “father of his country,” the term for the doctrine that the government is the ultimate guardian of all people under a disability, especially children, whose care is only “entrusted” to their parents. Under this doctrine, in a divorce action or a guardianship application the court retains jurisdiction until the child is 18 years old, and a judge may change custody, child support or other rulings affecting the child’s well-being, no matter what the parents may have agreed or the court previously decided. (See: divorce, custody, child support, guardian, ward)
Although we are not supporters of Glen Beck it is interesting he is now covering this topic of Agenda 21.
What Glen Beck does seem to not inform the public of is that the United States and Canada did not ratify the accord here in North America not under the U.N. multi-named projects and programs. However what has been happening is the U.N. has come under the fence directly into your state, towns, municipalities and counties to push the propaganda and the agenda.
Agenda’s objectives first came in under volunteer and soft laws, now however they are twisting the law to hard law’s where you own nothing. Not even your own body. They will under Parens Patriae come in and make all decisions regarding the land, people and resources. Make no mistake this group is developed by Soviet Union founders. The Soviet Union is now in control of the world within the Agenda 21 programs.
Nikita Khrushchev stated during a White House dinner party while intoxicated: “By 1990 we will implement and rule the world without taking a shot”. Upon his return to the Soviet Union he was reprimanded for his actions and taken out of power for revealing the truth. Agenda 21 was their plan through the United Nations. Who do you think set up the United Nations.
Khrushchev made his second and final visit to the United States in September 1960. He had no invitation, but had appointed himself as head of the USSR’s UN delegation. He spent much of his time wooing the new Third World states which had recently become independent. The U.S. restricted him to the island of Manhattan, with visits to an estate owned by the USSR on Long Island. The notorious shoe-banging incident occurred during a debate on October 12 over a Soviet resolution decrying colonialism. Infuriated by a statement of the Filipino delegate Lorenzo Sumulong which charged the Soviets with employing a double standard by decrying colonialism while dominating Eastern Europe, Khrushchev demanded the right to reply immediately, and accused Sumulong of being “a fawning lackey of the American imperialists”. Sumulong resumed his speech, and accused the Soviets of hypocrisy. Khrushchev yanked off his shoe and began banging it on his desk. This behavior by Khrushchev scandalized his delegation.
This is a Soviet program, it always has been.
Glenn Beck : Agenda 21 is not a fiction, it’s implemented right now in US and all over the World !
Thanks for visiting MaxResistance please like our Facebook and subscribe to our Twitter. If you would like to keep up to date on all our articles please hit the *FOLLOW button at the bottom right of this page and keep up with all our current articles. Thank you for your support, and please share our site and information.