The Movie Noah Promoting Communist Propaganda

Noah Movie: Promoting Communist Propaganda & Earth Worship in a Godless Society

David Risselada
If Christians could ever point to one definitive explanation of an effort to demonize their religion and replace it with so-called science and earth worship, the new Noah movie would be it. Produced by professed atheist, Darren Aronofsky, the movie portrays God as “Gaia,” the pagan deity worshiped by the new “green religion.” The film falls completely in lock step with the global warming alarmists as mankind’s biggest sin is portrayed as his reckless disrespect for the environment. This sounds an awful lot like the real efforts of the environmental radicals at the United Nations who are pushing for global communism as the only way to stop global warming. Could it be any more obvious that there is an agenda here?

What more could you expect from Hollywood liberals? The film was advertised to the younger generation as being “not your parent’s version of Noah.” This points to the director’s Marxist intent of separating younger viewers from their parents’ values and indoctrinating them into the secular, humanist world view. Also, when you consider the recent news that Valerie Jarrett is directing the media to portray Obamacare in a positive light, in films and television programming, at taxpayers’ expense, it’s completely possible that the larger agenda item of discrediting Christianity is at play here, at the direction of the government no less.


The film does a great deal more than prove that communist propaganda is alive and well, it puts into sharp perspective the state of our ever growing “Godless society.” In this case, art is truly reflecting life. We live in a world where every policy initiative essentially moves us towards secular humanism and away from Biblical Christianity. In the meantime, the soul of mankind is being destroyed as the value of human life, being defined by humanists, as opposed to the Word of God, has allowed people to forsake the gift of life itself. This is demonstrated by the clear disregard for the sanctity of human life. As The Journal of Medical Ethics argues, aborting a baby after birth is moral and ethical because a baby does not fit the secular, humanist definition of personhood. According to this argument, a human being is not defined as such until they are no longer dependent on others, and as such, parents should have the right to kill their children if they prove to be an undue burden. Yet somehow, through the twisted logic of the Godless, those that value human life and believe that life starts at conception are the radical ones.

This issue over the belief in God is clearly what separates our nation today. The political left and right are defined by this. To the right, liberty and human rights are defined by the natural state of mankind’s existence, and the belief held that we were created by God, and given unalienable rights to exercise our God given conscience. The right argues for the right to life as we believe everyone is born with the “equal right” to pursue that which makes them happy by employing their God given talents. The political left, for the most part, pushes secular humanism as the new religion, as they tend to believe that man needs to be managed. This belief is derived from a Darwinist world view, as the theory of evolution holds that mankind is merely an evolutionary accident, and we are no more than any other species of animal. With that particular world view being shoved down our throats in our secular school systems, is it any wonder people are choosing not to take responsibility for their actions, and exercise their government approved rights of abortion? Is it any wonder our society is rapidly falling?


While the connection between abortion and global warming may allude some, the relationship between the two rests, again, in the demonstrated value of human life. There are those in the global warming alarmist movement that have called for the imprisonment of those denying that man’s activity contributes to climate change. While this may seem like a far reaching argument it must be noted that more and more credible scientists are admitting to climate change alarmism, and how it is being used to consolidate government power. If mankind has lost value for the most precious and innocent among us, how could we possibly hold value for those that are being blamed for destroying the planet?

To conclude, the new Noah movie does little more than prove that there is an attempt to indoctrinate the gullible and uninformed into a worldview where the political left is desperate to initiate policy directives that revolve around a thesis that can’t be proven. By doing so, they are contributing to the devaluing of human life by ridiculing and demonizing those that have a differing worldview. Our nation is divided along deep ideological lines, those that value life as a gift from God, and those that believe they can redefine God’s meaning for us. –


We just walked out of this imbecilic, heretical, anti-God, Anti-bible, anti-christian, anti-Noah propaganda film. This film can be chalked up to a lunatic’s version of the story of Noah or the version of someone who read it on a PCP trip lol. I noticed only 3 of us walked out, I view that as a microcosm of the comatose state of the church in the U.S. today that is sleep walking dreaming about a pre-trib rescue rapture while hollywood satanists boldly mock, desecrate, make fun of & dance on the faith in every concievable way. Discernment test failed. And the satanist will continue to be emboldened as they see that the church doesn’t protest in mass united against such blatant slander.

In the New Noah Movie, the Fallen Angels are the Good Guys

Michael Snyder
In “Noah”, the fallen angels are “good guys” that were kicked out of heaven because of their compassion for humanity, they help Noah build the ark, and they ascend to heaven when they die helping defend the ark against a band of marauding evil humans. Director Darren Aronofsky stated that he attempted to make “the least biblical biblical film ever made”, and he may have achieved that. In “Noah”, almost everything is the opposite of what it should be. Instead of villains, the fallen angels are heroes. Instead of a preacher of righteousness, Noah is depicted as a psychopathic maniac that hates humanity and wants to kill his unborn grandchild if it is a girl. The movie somehow finds a way to avoid using the word “God” the entire time, and during a scene where Noah explains to his family how the world was “created”, the film displays visuals depicting Darwinian evolution. But all of the controversy surrounding the film only seems to have helped it at the box office. In fact, it pulled in approximately 44 million dollars in North America alone over opening weekend.

When I first heard that a movie about Noah starring Russell Crowe was coming out, I was very excited. I thought that it could spark discussion about one of the most important events in human history.

Unfortunately, the film twists and distorts the story of Noah so badly that it is virtually unrecognizable. And Americans are so dumbed down these days that many of them will end up believing that Aronofsky’s version is what the Bible actually says.

So before we get into the specifics of what “Noah” says about the fallen angels, let us first take a look at what the Scriptures tell us.

In Genesis 6:1-4 we read the following…

And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,

That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.

And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.

There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.

Obviously the fact that fallen angels got together with human women and produced hybrid offspring displeased God greatly, and in the book of Jude we read that these fallen angels are kept in chains awaiting the day of judgment…

And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.

The Book of Enoch, which is actually directly quoted in the book of Jude, refers to these fallen angels as “Watchers” and contains a lot more details about them. The following is how Wikipedia summarizes what the Book of Enoch has to say…

In the Book of Enoch, the Watchers (Aramaic. עִירִין, iyrin), are angels dispatched to Earth to watch over the humans. They soon begin to lust for human women and, at the prodding of their leader Samyaza, defect en masse to illicitly instruct humanity and procreate among them. The offspring of these unions are the Nephilim, savage giants who pillage the earth and endanger humanity. Samyaza and his associates further taught their human charges arts and technologies such as weaponry, cosmetics, mirrors, sorcery, and other techniques that would otherwise be discovered gradually over time by humans, not foisted upon them all at once. Eventually God allows a Great Flood to rid the earth of the Nephilim, but first sends Uriel to warn Noah so as not to eradicate the human race. The Watchers are bound “in the valleys of the Earth” until Judgment Day. (Jude verse 6 says that these fallen angels are kept “in everlasting chains under darkness” until Judgement Day.)

So of course any movie about Noah would clearly depict the fallen angels as the bad guys.



In Aronofsky’s version, they are actually good guys that help Noah build the ark…

This is the film that will introduce most of the country to the Watchers: fallen angels who, according to Aronofsky’s version, have been encrusted in stone and, with a little persuading, help Noah construct the ark (for giants with gobs of rock for hands, they are extraordinarily dexterous).

When I first heard this, I was absolutely dumbfounded.

And no, the Watchers were not giant rock monsters either. I have no idea where Aronofsky got that.

In “Noah”, the fallen angels are actually portrayed as being more compassionate than the Creator, and when they are banished to Earth for showing too much compassion for humanity they are rescued by Methuselah and his flaming sword…

It is recounted that the Watchers are friends with Methuselah because he saved them once. They came to earth to help the humans after the Creator had banished humans from Eden, but the Watchers too were punished for disobedience by the Creator, who bound them to the earth and forced them to take form as stone creatures. But after learning from them, the humans tried to enslave and kill them. They tried to run, and Methuselah helped their escape by fighting the waves of human soldiers with a burning sword.

Noah speaks with Methuselah and receives a seed passed down from the Garden of Eden. He plants the seed on a plain, and an entire forest grows upon it within seconds. This miracle convinces the Watchers that Noah is chosen by the Creator. Noah announces that all the wood will be used to build an ark, and they start to help with the construction work.

At the end of the movie, instead of receiving judgment, the fallen angels get to ascend to heaven as they die defending Noah’s ark from a violent horde of people trying to board it…

The fallen angels, led by Semjaza, defend Noah and the ark at the start of the flood from Tubal-Cain’s raging army that is fighting to board the ark. The Watchers begin to fall one by one under the army’s onslaught. As the first one dies, the Watcher cries out to the heavens for forgiveness, then his rock-like body transforms into light and shoots up into the sky. This “resurrection” prompts another rock giant to proclaim, “He returns to the Creator.”

I can just imagine how little kids that watch this film are going to feel. They are going to want to be just like the heroic “rock giants” that helped Noah. They are going to have absolutely no idea who “the Watchers” really are.

Normally I do not spend my time writing about Hollywood films. But hundreds of millions of people around the globe could end up seeing this movie over the next several years, and instead of learning about one of the most important events in human history, they are going to get a version of the story that is almost totally opposite of what it should be.

The truth is that fallen angels are real, they really did mate with human women, and the Nephilim really did exist.

You can find some of my previous articles about the Nephilim here, here, here and here.

And Noah really did exist as well, and Jesus told us that we should learn from him, because the days when Jesus returns will be very much like the days of Noah. In Matthew 24:37-39 it says the following…

But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.

For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark,

And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.

I really wish that Hollywood would have gotten this one right.

An accurate movie about Noah starring Russell Crowe would have been very cool.

Unfortunately, it didn’t turn out that way.


Also plz bookmark the home page and click the follow button on the bottom right of your screen thx! We appreciate your support and sharing of the information we provide.


1 Comment

  1. Avatar
    Ebola April 01, 2014

    Next time, do your research on Hollywood before heading to the movies… It will save you some trouble. Also, you might want to skip the feature for church next time.

Leave a Reply


Get every new post on this blog delivered to your Inbox.

Join other followers: